Understanding Management and Leadership

The Concept of Organizational Structure Leadership and management are terms used interchangeably in business and other corporate sectors. A leader concentrates on motivation of a group to accomplish common task. Leadership dwells more on social influence while management focuses on the use of people irrespective of self motivation and drive.Advertising We will write a custom assessment sample on Understanding Management and Leadership specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Vision and power forms the main difference that defines the two concepts. Leaders have visions and generate power from their subjects while managers may not have visios, instead, concentrates on power generated from positions (Saxena Awasthi, 2010, p.13). There is need for a good leader to strive and accommodate change by appreciating dynamic fluctuations in addition to motivation. He or she inspires and influences followers into the right destination while managers center their interest on maintaining status quo within a paradigm system (Saxena Awasthi, 2010, p.13). The two concepts of leadership and management are meant to complement each other for desirable results within an organization. It is therefore, possible to incorporate the two for achievement of goals and accomplishing tasks. One major cause for dispute is the diversity of concepts to embrace change, which may be reluctantly accepted by a manager at the expense of workers. Attaining great standards in leadership undermines growth of managers due to the diverse nature of interests (Harry Levinson, 1989, p. 65). An example of interaction between these concepts is demonstrated by Mike Merwin who is a supervisor at FLEXcom Company. He talks of distributing time in achieving both management and leadership practices. Management takes 30% while the rest goes to leadership (Thornton, 2003, p.3). Stephen Robbins together with Tim Judge suggests that efficient leaders should take into accou nt three basic roles for efficient delivery. One of the roles is conveyance of information (Robbins and Judge 2011). This involves reception, processing and dissemination of information across all sectors of a firm.Advertising Looking for assessment on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Internal and external systems are linked together via communication channels through an efficient network system for completion of goals and tasks (Robbins and Judge 2011). Interpersonal role qualifies the process to be efficient. The other role involves decision making. At this point, the entrepreneur makes a decision to take risk, handle disputes and act as a link between the business and external factors. A manager acts as centre of power representing interests of an organization. He or she is the flag bearer, leader and a pillar of motivation to the rest of the workforce. Self image and personal conduct of a manager is par amount in the perfection of the roles played when carrying out duties (Robbins Judge, 2011). The roles that are played by good management are vital for proper functioning of an organization. An example of a personality with good leadership is the former South African icon, Nelson Mandela who set an outstanding example in the fight against apartheid rule while in prison. He went ahead to defend integrity and endorsed peaceful coexistence instead of revenge against the former oppressors. This is a classic demonstration of good application of management roles to achieve a common targeted goal. The problem faced by middle level managers in terms of misplaced guidelines on job orientation according to Antonioni is, lack of management basics. This can be avoided by rationalizing the process of management that has fundamentals of good leadership incorporated. Valuation and change of roles to accommodate diversified opinions that are typical of leadership is important for well grooming of good managers other that those who find themselves ending up as managers by chance (Antonioni, 2000. P. 28). Tackling uncertainty by risk assessment is an important aspect of dealing with the stalemate scenario in a business process (Antonioni, 2000, p. 29). This is otherwise called â€Å"fear of unknown† which affects management and business administrative strategies because of eradication of risk-taking aspects of a business venture, a process that derails the entire entrepreneurial move (Antonioni, 2000, p. 29). References Antonioni, D. (2000, September/October). Leading, managing, and coaching. Industrial Management, 42(5), 27: Southern Management Association.Advertising We will write a custom assessment sample on Understanding Management and Leadership specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Levinson, H. (1989). Designing and Managing Your Career, Boston, Harvard Business School Publishing Division. Robbins, S. P. Judge,T.A . (2011). Essentials of Organizational Behavior with Self Assessment Library 3.4 Canada: Pearson College Division Publishers. Saxena Sanjay Awasthi Purnima, (2010). Leadership, M-97, Connaught Circus, New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Ltd. Thornton P. B. (2003). Triangles of Management and Leadership, United States of America, Coral Springs, FL. 33077-2246: Llumina Press. This assessment on Understanding Management and Leadership was written and submitted by user Ezra Burch to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Marissa Mayer At Google Example

Marissa Mayer At Google Example Marissa Mayer At Google – Case Study Example Marissa Mayer at Google Mayer being the first woman in Google has played a big role in increasing the number of womenin technology and Google. She was the first female engineer in Google and contributed to a great improvement of search engine. In 2011, Meyer assumed the role of overseeing engineering design, product management and laying strategy for product like Google Maps, Google Earth and local search. The contribution of the Meyer in his role has encouraged other women to get involved in technology and Google. Meyer started a campaign that Google should recruit women in the engineering department to ensure that the products interest both genders. She focused on encouraging women in America to enter technology field in order to have many engineers. In 2008, Meyer created a list of the top 50 women in business and this shows that she was determined to identify the talented women in technology in order to help them get involved in technology business and Google (Meyer 5). In the re sponsibility of increasing the number of women in technology and Google Meyer was faced with some advantages and disadvantages. First, she campaigned for gender equality in Google workforce and this was impossible since only view women studies technology. Those women who did technology could not work with Google, because they had established their own business. Some men criticized women in the work place hence discouragement. On the other hand, Meyer being progressive in business could influence many women to join the filed of technology. Google was picking after involvement of women in the business and this encouraged more people to accept Meyer’s decision of gender equality (Meyer 3).Work CitedMeyer Marisa. Marissa Mayer Biography. Viewed on October 21, 2013 from biography.com/people/marissa-mayer-20902689

Automotive Industry Analysis Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Automotive Industry Analysis - Research Paper Example Tichy (20-23) describes that the major evolution in the automotive industry is the introduction of the engine. The development was after the discovery of energy carrying means that include new fuels, and steam used in the 1700s. The new fuels in the 1800s included gas and gasoline. Later in 1876, there was the introduction of 4-stroke engine that involves the internal burning of gasoline fuels. In the same year, in Europe and America, there was an establishment of the first motor vehicle. In early 1900, the automobile industry introduced new technologies such as steering wheel and an accelerator. These two facilitated the growth of the industry, as vehicles became easier to operate. In the same years, societal developments occurred in America where they would provide a foundation for the production of automobiles. The government also introduced driver’s licenses and issued them to citizens. They opened many service stations and car sales improved with planned time payments. Ma ny models were introduced in the same year, such as Ford and other designs, where cars assumed another appearance. In the 1910s, societal development, as well as technologies, improved significantly. This facilitated the introduction of new methods of manufacturing and improved business strategies. Choudhury (1) shows that in the US, the roads were safe for users after the introduction of traffic rights and road signs. In 1913, Henry Ford launched his assembly line that facilitated mass production of vehicles, therefore, gaining the economies of scale. The renowned assembly line of Ford had the mass production idea process where they operated through compatible and ordinary parts. The workers making these vehicles started moving to other companies and merged with, for instance, GM that bought Chevrolet. According to Darlington (1), during the 1920s, there were more improvements of social infrastructure, development of various practices, designs and more companies merged with other a utomobile companies, for example, Ford merged with Lincoln and Chrysler later merging with Dodge. The US government and Bureau of Public Roads also introduced a Bill that facilitated completion of various road projects and formulating of national road system policies. There was also development in manufacturing where there were improved practices leading to the accessing of and assembling satisfactory cars according to customers’ needs. The companies that manufacture automobiles, such as Ford, focused upon the production of one type of model while others, such as GM, took on product variety as a new production strategy providing various models. This strategy helped in increasing the market share of the company by about 20 percent reducing the competitors’ market share. In 1930s, the industry saw the development of several brands of vehicles from different companies. The new trend was also felt in consumer preferences where most of them distinguished the European and Am erican markets. Consumers in the US market liked comfortable and large cars while those in Europe preferred smaller and economical cars. In the same years, companies such as GM continued to use their competitive strategy of producing a variety of models and it increased its market share against Ford that was losing customers. During the World War of 1940s,